Milestones
Bengal Famine of 1943
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
The wartime famine in the Bengal and Orissa provinces of British India; scholarly consensus puts the dead at about 2.1 million, within estimates running from 800,000 to 3.8 million. Why it happened is the most consequential argument in famine studies: contemporary officials blamed a harvest shortfall from cyclone, blight and lost Burma imports, while Amartya Sen showed the rice supply was barely below normal and located the disaster in collapsed purchasing power, hoarding, trade barriers and wartime priorities. That analysis of entitlement rather than supply reshaped how famine and food security are understood, and the debate between the two readings is still live.
Facts
Milestone Year LocationBengal Province and Orissa Province, British India 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Amartya Sen's entitlement analysis of this famine reframed hunger from supply to access, the core of modern food security
Sources
1. Bengal Famine of 1943 (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia FoundationLead section; causes and Ó Gráda consensus estimateQuote, Lead section; causes and Ó Gráda consensus estimate
The Bengal famine of 1943 was a famine during World War II in the Bengal Province and Orissa Province of British India.
Amartya Sen (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia FoundationPoverty and Famines (1981) sectionQuote, Poverty and Famines (1981) section
famine occurs not only from a lack of food, but from inequalities built into mechanisms for distributing food.
Open Questions (1 open question)
Was the Bengal famine of 1943 caused mainly by a real shortage of food, or by wartime policy and unequal distribution, and how many people actually died?
Amartya Sen's entitlement-failure analysis holds the 1943 famine was a distributional and wartime policy failure rather than an absolute food shortage, while death toll estimates themselves range from 0.8 to 3.8 million, with Cormac O Grada putting scholarly consensus near 2.1 million; the atlas records both the mechanism and the count as unsettled rather than adopting one figure.
What would resolve this A reconciled demographic reconstruction of wartime Bengal mortality that scholars broadly accept, and agreement on how much of the shortfall was genuine crop failure against wartime denial policy and market failure.
Economic history and historical demographyAmartya Sen (Wikipedia)
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.